SOUPS 2017 Posters Paper #6 Reviews and Comments =========================================================================== Paper #6 Nudges for Privacy and Security: Understanding and Assisting Users’ Choices Online Review #6A =========================================================================== Overall merit ------------- 4. Accept Reviewer expertise ------------------ 4. Expert Relevance to SOUPS community ---------------------------- 3. Strong fit for SOUPS community. Comments for author (abstract) ------------------------------ I think that the abstract is very well written, and it definitely makes me curious to read the paper. Well done! Comments for author (poster draft) ---------------------------------- I would suggest removing the overview because it is stating the same things as the abstract; you can bold the sections of the abstract that are stating what you have in the overview. Otherwise, you can try to cut down on the abstract a little or just replace the abstract with a more detailed overview. Just remember that the overview contains a lot of text and most people will skip over it due to this. I also want to know more about your findings: when is it best to nudge? when not to nudge? Also, it feels like you just added a bunch of images at the bottom. Can you either cite them or denote what goes with what image? I should have some understanding as to why these images are important and have been placed here. I strongly believe that this poster will be a good topic of conversation, however, I think that it needs a little more polishing. Hope that the feedback helps :) Review #6B =========================================================================== Overall merit ------------- 4. Accept Reviewer expertise ------------------ 3. Knowledgeable Relevance to SOUPS community ---------------------------- 3. Strong fit for SOUPS community. Comments for author (abstract) ------------------------------ The paper provides a multidisciplinary assessment of literature on privacy and security trade-offs, decision-making hurdles and ways to mitigate those. It is a valuable survey in contributing research understanding of user choices that can lead to ways to assist users. Comments for author (poster draft) ---------------------------------- Good fit for the poster session. Can lead to discussions on assisting users while respecting their choices.