Search keywords
Basics
all submissions in the search category |
“story” in title, abstract, authors |
submission #119 |
submissions in the numbered set with “kernel” in title, abstract, authors |
“802” in title, abstract, authors (not submission #802) |
“very” and “new” in title, abstract, authors |
the same |
the phrase “very new” in title, abstract, authors |
either “very” or “new” in title, abstract, authors |
use parentheses to group |
“very” but not “new” in title, abstract, authors |
the same |
words that start with “ve” in title, abstract, authors |
words that contain “me” in title, abstract, authors |
Title
title contains “flexible” |
Abstract
abstract contains “very novel” |
Authors
author list contains “poletto” |
more than four authors |
Collaborators
collaborators contains “liskov” |
Topics
selected topics match “link” |
Submission fields
submission’s Poster draft field is set Also has:Demo, has:PrePub |
Tags
tagged “discuss” (“tag:discuss” also works) |
not tagged “discuss” |
tagged “discuss”, sort by tag order (“rorder:” for reverse order) |
matches any tag that starts with “disc” |
Reviews
you are a reviewer |
“fdabek” in reviewer name/email |
four reviewers (assigned and/or completed) |
less than three completed reviews Use “cre:<3” for short. |
at least one incomplete review |
at least one in-progress review (started, but not completed) |
at least two primary reviewers |
at least one secondary reviewer |
at least one external reviewer |
“fdabek” has completed a primary review |
has a review requested by you |
has a review requested by you that hasn’t been accepted or edited yet |
has a review with less than 100 words in author-visible fields |
has a positively-rated review (“rate:bad”, “rate:biased”, etc. also work) |
has a positively-rated review by you |
Review fields
at least one completed review has a nonempty Overall merit field Also RevExp:any, RelSOUPSCom:any, ComAutAbs:any, ComAutPos:any |
at least one completed review has Overall merit 3 Also RevExp:value, RelSOUPSCom:value |
at least one completed review has Overall merit greater than 3 Also RevExp:comparison, RelSOUPSCom:comparison |
at least one completed review has Overall merit in the 2–4 range Also RevExp:any:v1-v2, RelSOUPSCom:any:v1-v2 |
all completed reviews have Overall merit in the 2–4 range |
Overall merit in completed reviews spans the 2–4 range This means all scores between 2 and 4, with at least one 2 and at least one 4. |
at least 4 completed reviews have Overall merit 3 |
exactly 2 completed reviews have Overall merit 3 |
at least one completed review has “finger” in the Comments for author (abstract) field |
at least one completed review has an empty Comments for author (abstract) field Also ComAutPos:empty |
Comments
at least one visible reviewer comment (not including authors’ response) |
at least three visible reviewer comments |
at least one reviewer comment visible to authors |
“sylvia” (in name/email) wrote at least one visible comment; can combine with counts, use reviewer tags |
has author’s response |
at least two visible comments, possibly including author’s response |
Leads
“fdabek” (in name/email) is discussion lead |
no assigned discussion lead |
some assigned discussion lead |
Shepherds
“fdabek” (in name/email) is shepherd (“none” and “any” also work) |
Conflicts
you have a conflict with the submission |
“fdabek” (in name/email) has a conflict with the submission This search is only available to chairs and to PC members who can see the submission’s author list. |
some PC member has a conflict with the submission |
at least three PC members have conflicts with the submission |
a reviewer of submission 1, 2, or 3 has a conflict with the submission |
Preferences
you have preference 3 |
a PC member’s preference has expertise “X” (expert) |
“fdabek” (in name/email) has preference > 0 Administrators can search preferences by name; PC members can only search preferences for the PC as a whole. |
Status
submission is ready for review |
submission is incomplete (neither ready nor withdrawn) |
submission has been withdrawn |
final version uploaded |
Decisions
decision is “Accepted” (partial matches OK) |
one of the accept decisions |
one of the reject decisions |
decision specified |
decision unspecified |
Formulas
all reviews have Overall merit score 3 Formulas can express complex numerical queries across review scores and preferences. |
“f” is shorthand for “formula” |
variance in OveMer is above 0.5 |
at least one reviewer had Overall merit score 3 and review preference < 0 |
Display
show tags and PC conflicts in the results |
hide title in the results |
show a formula |
sort by score |
sort by score variance |
sort by reverse status |
edit the values for tag “#discuss” |
like “search1 OR search2”, but submissions matching “search1” are grouped together and appear earlier in the sorting order |
faceted display |
search for “search1”, but highlight submissions in that list that match “search2” (also try HIGHLIGHT:pink, HIGHLIGHT:green, HIGHLIGHT:blue) |